Posted by: tootingtrumpet | March 1, 2011

The Netherlands vs West Indies – The Final Over of the Day

Kieron Pollard deals with another bowler.

Ball One – On commentary, David Lloyd wonders why Gayle and Smith are wearing helmets on a slow, low pitch against medium pacers. It’s a valid point, but one that I suggest may have two answers. There’s always the chance of a top edge into the side of the head, which is nasty and best avoided. And batsmen may feel at home, following routines, doing business as usual wearing the helmet. There’s much talk of visualising as a technique to aid concentration in sport, so, if a batsman has always visualised starting the innings in a helmet, then why make things different?

Ball Two – As an aside, and maybe because I have spent my working life in environments in which one meets gay people all the time, I have always thought that if sports stars come out as gay, nobody would bat an eyelid. Steven Davies, Surrey and England wicketkeeper, has done so and nobody seems bothered, aside from praising his honesty and willingness to take on the burden of being the first openly gay professional cricketer. Unlike footballers, cricketers do travel to parts of the world where attitudes may not be as enlightened as they are in South London – I trust Steven Davies will be treated exactly as would Matt Prior or Craig Kieswetter, sledging and all. “Be like Mike” was a sports marketing slogan that worked: there will be a few young gay cricketers this morning knowing that they can “Be like Steven Davies” and reach the very top – and that’s a fine thing.  Now Steve, let’s see a few nurdles to complement your hitting over the top.

Ball Three – Chris Gayle is not a man for the reverse sweep, the Dilscoop, the nurdle into the gaps, but he still scores about as fast as any player in the game. Of course, not every player has Gayle’s power, but, with bats constructed as they are these days, clearing the boundary is no big deal (five England players managed it yesterday – five!). After a spell of batting innovation coinciding with the launch of T20, orthodoxy is reasserting itself. Frustration did get the better of Gayle in the end – he may enjoy the bigger challenges to come rather more than bashing amateur bowlers.

Ball Four – Kieron Pollard is renowned for being the biggest hitter in world cricket, his power generated from a cruiserweight’s build and a free-flowing bat.  He has usually been held back by the West Indies for a short sharp blast, but perhaps his promotion to Five with more than ten overs remaining marks a change of strategy for Darren Sammy’s men. That has to be the right tactic – no point in leaving Pollard’s violence in the pavilion.

Ball Five – I understand Peter Borren’s decision to bowl, but with four down and nearly 300 to get, it’s game over. If the Netherlands were 34-4 setting a target, the game would be nearly over, but not quite as a batting collapse is much more possible than its bowling / fielding equivalent. If minnows bowl first, they are waiting for the batsmen to get themselves out, as there is no real pace nor spin to take wickets. Bowling second, there’s at least a chance of scoreboard pressure doing its job – chasing small targets can be tricky; taking six wickets for 300 runs or restricting a side with only six wickets in hand to under 7.5 per over cannot be tricky.

Ball Six – Reviews on the subcontinent are always worth a shout, as the ball is almost never going over the top. Unless the spinner really rips it – and few do these days – pitching on and hitting on usually means the ball will be projected to hit the stumps, though umpires may be understandably reluctant to give batsmen out on the front foot. I suspect fielding captains will become more and more enthusiastic about reviewing.

The Tooting Trumpet, whom you can often find at and on Twitter at @garynaylor999


  1. Toots, as no one has left a comment, I’ll write one to offer a different opinion on ball 5.
    I don’t see the point in stretching a “contest” over as many overs as possible. 4-34 is big trouble for any team, Associate or otherwise.
    For me, on these pitches, the best chance (and the deeper we go into the tournament the only chance) any team has of winning an ODI against a much stronger opponent is to bowl first and hope the opponent settles for or contrives to produce a score which turns out to be below par.
    Actually, while writing this opinion, I wonder if any of you betting gurus have done the maths on this one. Are Associates better off batting or bowling first in WC matches?

  2. Well since only two Associates have come anywhere near a win so far I guess it’s difficult to tell. Netherlands batted first, put on a really good score and still lost with an over to spare. Ireland bowled first, skittled their opponents for a meagre score and then got bowled out for an even lower one. I doubt we’ll see any more close shaves like that since the surprise factor has now gone from Ireland and Netherlands and the others are just too poor.

    • Or maybe not. Ireland will be kicking themselves for stuffing up so badly against the Deshis now!

  3. Openers now out – Ireland should bring Rankin back on to see if Bell will do anything silly. Boyd’s had a poor time of it of late so maybe bowling to county team mates might help him more than geting carted in the last 10 overs again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: