Posted by: tootingtrumpet | July 23, 2012

England vs South Africa First Test The Final Over of the Day – Day Four

Not Graeme Smith’s field

Ball One – From behind – not an angle one sees often on television – Jacques Kallis looks a lot like Graham Gooch. Bulky, but balanced, as the bowler hits the crease, the bat is raised with, so it appears, half the shot already completed. The  slightly baseball stance can look inelegant, but it worked for Gooch and it’s working for Kallis.

Ball Two – On 94, Kallis is called through for a sharp single by Amla and the umpire refers Ian Bell’s direct hit. Kallis, a man who never gives his wicket away, was motoring and was in easily. Often overlooked when people appraise him – positively or, unbelievably, negatively – is his remarkable durability. He misses few matches and is usually fit to bowl, if a bit reluctant. When younger, he was a genuinely fast bowler: now in his mid-30s, he is no longer a fast bowler, but he’s still an athlete.

Ball Three – Wonderful appreciation from the crowd, not just of the obvious milestones as they were knocked off, but of slightly more obscure ones. All around me, people were on their feet as Hashim Amla passed AB de Villers’ erstwhile record South African Test score.  Smartphones mean that everyone knows everything these days.

Ball Four – Just one run short of the highest ever score for the loss of two wickets in Test cricket’s 135 year history, Graeme Smith declares 252 ahead with 43 overs left in the day. That surprise move has a number of consequences. It brings the England win back into the game – a long shot, but fifth day targets of 140 or so can be tricky. It also denies the crowd a chance to salute Hashim Amla and Jacques Kallis and for them to accept the congratulations of their opponents on the field. In the long run, it may not amount to a hill of beans, but nobody expected Smith to be quite so attacking.

Ball Five – If I were the best bowler in the world and had sat for two days watching my batsmen score a monumental total, I think I would like a third slip in the quest to take ten wickets. I might also suggest that if a mid-on is required to block a scoring option, perhaps my batsmen should have been allowed to get a few more. Modern captaincy is something I’ll never understand. Sure enough, KP is dropped by Jacques Kallis trying to cover the vacant third slip position.

Ball Six – Imran Tahir, whose best weapon is his googly, comes on to bowl without a silly point. Do not ask me why. I cannot account for it.

You can tweet me @garynaylor999



  1. I’ve always been amazed at the durability of Kallis. He rarely gets injured. Shane Watson should get some tips.

  2. TT, I can’t agree with you about the declaration. Even in the best case scenario, England might have only had a session to roll the Africans. Tea was certainly where I think Smith ought to have pulled the pin, although perhaps they were 20-30 runs short of what they might have got. Even that is better than normal. In the past South Africa have regularly coasted towards the declaration, keeping wickets they won’t use and wasting overs. There was reasonable intent in the lead-up yesterday.

    You didn’t mention England once. How is it that they’ve just taken 1 wicket in effectively 2 days of play? Amla and Kallis showed great restraint and skill, but I wonder whether Strauss might have tried more.

    • Proof of the pudding was in the eating and SA won, so the declaration was proved right. I do think that if Bell and Prior had got going, they (and the crowd) would have got a huge lift from getting past the SA aggregate score and making them bat again. 50 more runs from Kallis and Amla would have taken that out of the equaton.

  3. I can’t see England winning this. We haven’t got Monty.

  4. Great declaration – certainly caught Cook on the hop!
    In years to come, then they talk about South Africa’s big win, they will not ask the question who cheered off Alma and Kallis at the end of the South African innings, but on South Africa’s version of a question of sport, they might ask the question who took two wickets!

    • It’s a good point Jim. Maybe if Smith had the English bowlers (or no Steyn) it might have looked a little premature.

      • Nah, all bowlers are great front runners! But what SA did on day 5 was what makes their bowlers better than most.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: